Paterson says "hand is forced," considering layoffs this year

David Paterson in profileAppearing on the Capitol Pressroom today, David Paterson said he's considering state worker layoffs this year:

... what bothers me is, it's gnawing me, I don't think I should be setting up a layoff plan for the next governor to do. I think if you're going to layoffs, you do them yourself. And so I'm really considering altering [the layoff plan for next year] and starting the layoffs sooner... [in] 2010.
We need $250 million in workforce reductions and we have not come close to that. That's why we tried to do the furloughs, the court told us we couldn't do it. That's why we tried to get five days extra lag pay in negotiation, and the workers wouldn't do it. And so I think our hand is forced here.

Paterson said his administration is "still calculating" how many layoffs might be involved -- the number of early retirees would play a role in the number.

I don't want to lay people off ... This is just the unfortunate situation that I turned up in going back to a little over two years ago when I became governor that it's the worst economic times in the state's history and I've had to do things that go against what I have felt in my heart, the same way those Republican senators had to vote against how they feel about the extenders. But what I'm doing and what I think they're doing and other are doing here at the Capitol is we're trying to adjust to a crisis.

If Paterson tries to layoff state workers, the public employee unions will almost certainly sue because of the no-layoffs agreement they have with him.

Also: The state Senate passed a bill today that would institute a "Question Time with the Prime Minister" style session between the governor and the legislature each month. We'd watch that. [TU Cap Con]

Yep, the Capitol Pressroom advertises on AOA. That's where the the governor said it.

file photo via Paterson press images

Comments

Has our fearless leader given up his salary yet? Of course not.

Has he considered cutting the legislators' pet projects from the budget? Maybe starting with McDonald's great plan to throw money at NYRA? Nope.

Has he put any thought into the unions' suggestion of hiring the army of consultants as state employees (employee gets paid $25k.yr to do the same job the state pays a consultant $125k)? No.

Patterson is a fool. And most of the legislature is, as well. Come election day, we should remember this.

It makes sense to me, the state workforce is too large for a state with a continuing decline in population. This state needs to streamline services and cut the fat.

@JiminyGuy: The problem with cutting the fat is that, in the past, it has usually resulted in backfilling with more consultants to provide essential services we all rely on. You can shrink the "state workforce" if you like -- and in fact it HAS shrunk -- but don't be fooled into thinking that's the same thing as government efficiency.

@J - The consultants may cost the state more than the salary of a corresponding state worker, but don't think the consultants themselves get paid that _or_ that that salary is the total cost of employing a state worker.

As a consultant to the state, once upon a time (6 years ago) I got paid about the same as the state workers at my same level, +/- $5-8k. There was markup, which raised that cost to the state about another 30%. That markup paid for my health care, retirement, and a small percentage went to the overhead of the people in the back office who supported me. Similarly, a State employee cost the state more than just the salary. Add in benefits and the like, and, I think today you will find it is just about a wash.

The difference? It's really easy to fire a consultant. Not so much with a state employee. Even, for example, if they spend their day doing nothing, reading Facebook, blogging about how much their job sucks, or working their butt off for someone who motivates them.

The original motivations for the state for hiring consultants was that it was cheaper when you factored in the overhead of a state employee and the difficulty in moving them in and out of jobs. It made sense for the State. It still makes sense when you look at how hard it is going to be to lay off state workers. It's going to happen, though it's going to cost us many dollars to fight the lawsuits, win or loose. And, by the way, it's going to cost the state workers many dollars to fight the lawsuits too.


NY has more state workers per capita than any other state as far as I know. That is a problem. The bureaucracy is a problem. For example, the fact that an entire agency is maintained to purchase goods for the other agencies, who are, in turn, not required to purchase things through the purchasing agency and maintain their own purchasing departments strikes me as a bit nuts.

I have a great deal of respect for many State employees. Many work hard. Some do not. Just like the commercial world.

Patterson is in a tough place. There need to be many many cuts in state spending. Payroll is but one of many. Do I want to see my parks closed? No. Do I want to see my friends who work as consultants and as State employees laid off? No. Do I want to see spending cut on programs that are important to me? No. Do I want to pay more in taxes? Nope. But something has got to give. The legislature is playing chicken with the gov, and I think he has indicated, right or wrong, he isn't going to blink.

New York is going to be a very tough place to live for the next 5-10 years no matter what. We are in a financial hole and there is no simple, clean, easy way out.

Let me get this straight. State workers receive a mandatory raise every year, are illegal to furlough, receive a pension, and can't be laid off? Um, sorry to my friends in those jobs, but that's just ridiculous!

Say Something!

We'd really like you to take part in the conversation here at All Over Albany. But we do have a few rules here. Don't worry, they're easy. The first: be kind. The second: treat everyone else with the same respect you'd like to see in return. Cool? Great, post away. Comments are moderated so it might take a little while for your comment to show up. Thanks for being patient.

The Scoop

Ever wish you had a smart, savvy friend with the inside line on what's happening around the Capital Region? You know, the kind of stuff that makes your life just a little bit better? Yeah, we do, too. That's why we created All Over Albany. Find out more.

Recently on All Over Albany

Riding along with the skyline

We noticed this car in the Honest Weight parking lot the other day. It was wrapped -- both sides -- with an image of the... (more)

The First (and Probably Last) Annual Capital Region Feline Film and Video Festival for Humans at The Spectrum

Because we are a site on the internet we are required to post something about this -- because cats: The [deep breath] First (and... (more)

Boom bucks

Cost to implode and cleanup the Wellington annex, via Mike DeMasi: $160,000. (We wonder how much it would cost to do the same for the... (more)

Behold! New Lebanon

The Columbia County town of New Lebanon -- it's just across the border with Rensselaer County -- is attempting to turn itself into "the nation's... (more)

Drawing: Saratoga Wine & Food Festival

The Saratoga Wine & Food Festival is coming up this weekend at SPAC. And we have tickets for two of the festival's events. And we're... (more)

Recent Comments

... We also had tantalizing tomatoes that made us smile and have some more.The tomatoes were a gift from a man in the community gardens in Albany, that grew them just so he could share with people.That made them even sweeter...

Drawing: Saratoga Wine & Food Festival

...has 49 comments, most recently from Katie

The First (and Probably Last) Annual Capital Region Feline Film and Video Festival for Humans at The Spectrum

...has 1 comment, most recently from Cori

Boom bucks

...has 2 comments, most recently from Hock41

Behold! New Lebanon

...has 1 comment, most recently from Jessica R W

What to do with used books?

...has 9 comments, most recently from Tess