Jump to the text of this post.

State Senate

breslin_district_2002-2012.png

farley_district_2002-2012.png

mcdonald_district_2002-2012.png

new_senate_46.png

City closeups

2012 proposed Senate districts Troy

2012 proposed Senate districts Schenectady

2012 proposed Senate districts Saratoga Springs


State Assembly

mceney_district_2002-2012.png

canestrari_district_2002-2012.png

reilly_district_2002-2012.png

amedore_district_2002-2012.png

tedisco_district_2002-2012.png

jordan_district_2002-2012.png

mclaughlin_district_2002-2012.png

lopez_district_2002-2012.png

City closeups

2012 proposed Assembly districts Albany

2012 proposed Assembly districts Troy

2012 proposed Assembly districts Schenectady

The Capital Region's legislative districts, before and after the proposed new lines

capital region 2012 proposed assembly districts

How Capital Region state Assembly districts could shape up.

Update: Andrew Cuomo says he'll veto the new lines, which probably means negotiations and adjustments. [AP/WSJ]
____

The task force in charge of drawing new districts for the state Senate and Assembly released its slate of proposed maps this week. As this is New York State politics, there was much criticism. And we'll get to some of that in a bit.

The Capital Region could potentially end up being affected by a lot by the proposed new district lines. Most significantly, the task force is proposing to add a new Senate district that would cover the southwest corner of the area. But there are also shifts in the city of Albany, Saratoga Springs, Schenectady, and Troy.

Reading about all this, we found it kind of hard to keep all the old and new maps straight. So we've we've put together before-and-after versions of the Capital Region's legislative districts -- the current districts side by side with the proposed new lines.

Citizens of the Capital Region, meet what could be your new gerrymanders...

(Background on the word "gerrymander.")

The maps are above in large format. Scroll all the way up.

Capital Region highlights

+ There's been speculation that the new state Senate district -- Senate 46 -- was created for George Amedore, a Republican who currently represents a western chunk of the Capital Region. Amedore is being a bit coy about whether he'd run for the seat. [Daily Gazette]

+ The new districts would move much of Troy out of Roy McDonald's district and into Neil Breslin's district (Breslin's current district -- which all of Albany County -- has been chopped up as part of the creation of the new district).

+ The Assembly maps shift the line in the city of Albany -- Jack McEneny's district was pushed farther uptown, and Ron Canestrari's district now covers the Delaware Ave neighborhood.

+ Jim Tedisco's new Assembly district wouldn't include most of Saratoga Springs.

+ Bob Reilly's Assembly district was shifted out of the Clifton Park area and toward Schenectady. He's not happy about that. He called up Jimmy Vielkind, unprompted, to call the new lines "completely, egregiously unfair." [TU CapCon]

Criticism

Andrew Cuomo apparently isn't a fan of the new lines (he's been threatening to veto the result for weeks) -- a spokesman's reaction to the maps: "At first glance, these lines are simply unacceptable and would be vetoed by the governor." [TU]

Good government groups have been criticizing the redistricting process for months. And the release of the maps didn't change that. The head of Common Cause New York said the maps "appear to continue the long tradition of partisan gerrymandering we've come to expect."

The Senate maps, in particular, were targeted for criticism, as Senate Republicans were accused of drawing the lines -- and adding a district -- in order to keep control of the chamber. Of the Senate maps, NYPIRG's Bill Mahoney wrote, "clearly the most gerrymandered lines in recent New York history." He explained with some data:

There are several methods of measuring how representative of voters districts are. The typical deviation from the ideal population is one of the few completely objective criteria that can be used. While judging this set of proposed maps by this yardstick, the Senate's maps are clearly the most gerrymandered lines in recent New York history. The Assembly's are slightly better than 2002's final maps, but fall far short of providing mathematically equal representation.
Senate: Districts 3% or further from ideal population:
1984: 0
1992: 0
2002: 19
2012: 50
Senate: Districts within 1% of ideal population (as proposed in Gov. Cuomo's bill)
1984: 44 out of 61
1992: 47 out of 61
2002: 11 out of 62
2012: 3 out of 63
Assembly: Districts 3% or further from ideal population:
1984: 15
1992: 49
2002: 70
2012: 67
Assembly: Districts within 1% of ideal population:
1984: 92
1992: 46
2002: 18
2012: 26

A site called the New York World has put together a map that makes it easy to see state Senate Republicans' strategy at work.

Maybe the most honest assessment of the process from a politician came from Jack McEneny, who chaired the Assembly side of the task force. When asked whether the process was non-partisan: "No. I think it was done by people who are very much in politics and know exactly where they're drawing the lines." [State of Politics]

maps: LATFOR

Comments

Now seems like a good time to point out the Redistricting Game, a very cool way of learning about how redistricting (and, thus, gerrymandering) occurs.

http://www.redistrictinggame.org/

We need a new name for this redistricting process. Skelosmandering?

Say Something!

We'd really like you to take part in the conversation here at All Over Albany. But we do have a few rules here. Don't worry, they're easy. The first: be kind. The second: treat everyone else with the same respect you'd like to see in return. Cool? Great, post away. Comments are moderated so it might take a little while for your comment to show up. Thanks for being patient.

The Scoop

Ever wish you had a smart, savvy friend with the inside line on what's happening around the Capital Region? You know, the kind of stuff that makes your life just a little bit better? Yeah, we do, too. That's why we created All Over Albany. Find out more.

Recently on All Over Albany

Mini hot dogs from Pete's Pups

It takes a lot of chutzpah to start a hotdog joint in the Capital Region. We know our hotdogs, especially mini dogs. While other parts... (more)

A big enough Lyft?

Over at NY Mag there's a long profile of Lyft, the taxi-app service that's most publicly been pushing for New York State legislation that would... (more)

For sale: caboose

The realization of your lifelong dream of owning a train caboose approaches: New York State is selling an old caboose via its state surplus eBay... (more)

Solarize Albany

There's a boom in solar energy installations right now, including in the residential market. And all sorts of companies have popped up offering home installations... (more)

Take a different way

One of the takeaways of an analysis of on-time flight arrivals and departures for ALB by the Biz Review's Todd Kehoe: avoid flying through O'Hare.... (more)

Recent Comments

But where else would it go? We need a roadway connecting those areas somewhere or else downtown businesses are doomed. Whats' the alternative, demolishing downtown to put a highway there? I don't think so. 787 is here to stay. I think we need to look at lower hanging fruit solutions and make the best of what we have. ...

Four takeaways from the kickoff for the study about the future of I-787

...has 10 comments, most recently from Dot Beech

Solarize Albany

...has 2 comments, most recently from Ryan

For sale: caboose

...has 2 comments, most recently from ethan

Latham Sonic now open

...has 5 comments, most recently from Thepersonalispolitical

Rail, River, Hudson II

...has 5 comments, most recently from Nancy L.