Feds: Men conspired to build mobile x-ray weapon. | Is that possible?
Updated
Federal prosecutors announced today that two men -- Glendon Scott Crawford, 49, of Galway and Eric J. Feight, 54, of Hudson -- have been arrested for an alleged plot in which the two conspired to build a remotely-operated mobile x-ray weapon. From the press release:
The arrests followed a lengthy investigation by the Albany FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force that began in April 2012 when authorities received information that Crawford had approached local Jewish organizations seeking out individuals who might offer assistance in helping him with a type of technology that could be used against people he perceived as enemies of Israel. ...
As charged in a Complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Albany, the essence of the defendants' scheme was the creation of a mobile, remotely operated, radiation emitting device capable of killing targeted individuals silently with lethal doses of X-ray radiation. The defendants plotted to use this device against unwitting victims who would not immediately be aware that they had absorbed lethal doses of radiation, the harmful effects of which would only appear days after the exposure. This was an undercover investigation and, unbeknownst to the defendants, the device that the defendants designed and intended to use was rendered inoperable at all times and posed no danger to the public.
The federal complaint is embedded after the jump.
In the complaint, the feds allege Crawford "identified Muslims and several other individuals/groups as targets." They allege he had contact with the KKK, and that he also tried to solicit support from local Jewish organizations to help build a weapon that could be used against Israel's enemies (the TU reports one of the orgs was Congregation Gates of Heaven in Schenectady) -- the orgs reported Crawford and that put him on the radar with authorities. Feight was allegedly brought in to help build a device for remotely activating the radiation weapon.
The Times Union has more details from the complaint, in which the feds say Crawford never got a hold of a radiation source because an undercover FBI agent was acting as his supplier.
The allegations are unsettling and bizarre. And they prompt a lot of questions about the situation -- perhaps the primary one is whether these guys could have actually pulled off what they allegedly intended to do if the FBI hadn't been running interference.
We talked with a nuclear engineer about just that question this afternoon...
Is it possible to build a death ray?
Peter Caracappa* is on the faculty of the nuclear engineering program at RPI. His speciality is radiation safety and medical applications of radiation.
So, could these guys have built a death ray? Caracappa calls such a device "extremely infeasible."
He says it's plausible the two men could have built some type of radiation device. But it's very implausible that they could have actually built a device capable of delivering a lethal dose of radiation at distance over a short amount of time.
The central difficulty in building a working version of the alleged device is the nature of how radiation works. The intensity of radiation diminishes rapidly as you move away from the source -- it's an inverse-square relationship between intensity and distance.
So, say there was a device that could deliver a lethal dose at 30 cm. To deliver a lethal dose at 300 meters would require a million times more power. "The idea of it might be theoretically possible, but is extremely infeasible because of the tremendous amount of power and or cooling that would be required to deliver a lethal radiation dose in a short period of time."
Caracappa says to fit all that into a van, as the feds allege the men planned, is improbable. He points to radiation machines used in some types of cancer treatment -- their equipment takes up whole rooms in hospitals. And most radiation devices available just aren't designed to deliver the sort of doses necessary. Caracappa says the power on many industrial machines -- which are often designed to operate at short distances -- would have to be increased 100x to deliver a fatal dose in a short amount time. Pushing that amount of power through a device would probably cause its components to melt down.
"Could you theoretically make something that would do what they wanted to do? Maybe. But you couldn't possibly do what they wanted to do with off-the shelf components, even with equipment used in industrial settings."
That said, the subject of radiation understandably makes a lot of people uneasy. That's also what makes it attractive to terrorists. As Caracappa notes, in most situations "the terror related to radiation is more about the fear than the actual damage."
* It's true -- Peter is Mary's husband.
The complaint
Hi there. Comments have been closed for this item. Still have something to say? Contact us.
Comments
Well I'm glad the FBI is preventing hateful people from doing impossible things!
... said ethan on Jun 19, 2013 at 3:49 PM | link
So weird indeed. "a powerful industrial x-ray machine that would be powered by batteries". Batteries? From a van? Might as well mount lasers on sharks.
"the terror related to radiation is more about the fear than the actual damage", true, and it makes for a good story too -- in that respect, not sure why the TU is not mentioning how impractical such weapon would be. There is only one Peter, but ask a radiologist. ..
... said -S on Jun 19, 2013 at 4:22 PM | link
Did you hear the news?
Saw it on TV.
Now ray guns are not only just the future...
... said d on Jun 19, 2013 at 4:35 PM | link
Stupid inverse squares, getting in the way of a good evil laugh.
... said Carl on Jun 19, 2013 at 4:36 PM | link
@Carl: might as well blame Newton, and therefore the Brits :) Oh wait, Dr. Evil is British, never mind.
... said -S on Jun 19, 2013 at 4:45 PM | link
Interesting. I wonder what constitutes "material support for terrorism." Since attempting to build the impossible is kind of a tough crime to convict
If I attempt to build a time machine to assassinate George Washington, have I committed a crime?
... said Ike on Jun 19, 2013 at 5:00 PM | link
I love this story so much. I love imagining every stupid step of it.
"Yes, hello, Rabbi. I was hoping you could get me in touch with the Israeli military. I am working on a radiation death ray that I think they would be interested in."
Or the informants who posed as Klansmen from South Carolina looking to buy the weapon. At least they have a legitimate insanity defense. It sounds like they were living in cuckoo land.
... said Ryan on Jun 19, 2013 at 5:20 PM | link
In light of the NSA spying scandals, one would think it would have behooved Special Agent Kent to specifically outline when a wiretap warrant was obtained. Might Crawford's defense rely on this? Or, is a filed complaint simply enough for my, your's or Crawford's phone records to be monitored by the FBI for 14 months?
... said Jeff S on Jun 20, 2013 at 9:32 AM | link
My bad, its on Document page 5, item 13.
... said Jeff S on Jun 20, 2013 at 9:58 AM | link
Rex Smith brought up a good point this morning...Are these not Extremist Christian Terrorists?
... said komradebob on Jun 20, 2013 at 10:42 AM | link
Does the fact that one of the accused is a member of the KKK suggest there is an active, local KKK chapter? If so, that's truly the most terrifying aspect of this whole situation.
... said AddiesDad on Jun 20, 2013 at 11:01 AM | link
Good thing we have PRISM to protect us!
But who needs PRISM when we have ENTRAPMENT?
Providing a device? Really?
This, by the way, is how most of the "plots" of the past decade have been foiled: find outcasts and malcontents and give them just enough to almost, but not quite, do something (and in this case, something impossible). If they won't go along with the "plot," keep pressure and material reward promises up until someone gives in.
These are not real threats, but manufactured ones. Serves the purpose of keeping you fearful once sensationalized in the media though, doesn't it?
To preempt any would-be critics: this is not a defense of these individuals but a defense against law enforcement strategies and tactics that are highly problematic for any free and open society. In light of the NSA revelations, this should be on your mind.
... said Cincinnatus on Jun 20, 2013 at 12:10 PM | link
@AddiesDad -- I don't know about active, but this was KKK territory in the 1920s when the Klan was more likely to target Catholics immigrants, and Jews (not offer to defend the latter). The State Museum has Klan robes in its collection (currently on display in the Civil War exhibit) that have New York State provenance from the 1920s. The real hot bed of Klan activity, though, was Binghamton.
... said chrisck on Jun 20, 2013 at 12:23 PM | link