A bit more about the Park South redevelopment and that big parking garage

park south parking garage rendering 2013 Robin

A rendering of the proposed parking garage and adjacent residential units, from Robin Street.

Some follow up on the Park South redevelopment in Albany, and the rather large parking garage that's raised a few eyebrows...

The city planning board gave the three amendments to the plan -- taller buildings along New Scotland, more residential units, the siting of the parking garage -- its "qualified" approval last week. The qualified part of that: the planning board noted the approval was "subject to further review of the elevations for the parking structure" (link added).

Also: The city's planning staff issued a memo on the parking garage, which highlights many of the concerns that have been raised about the size of the garage and how it relates to the other buildings around it. A clip:

The height of the parking structure should ideally not exceed that of the liner buildings proposed to buffer its presence on adjacent residential streets. The distribution of residential, office and commercial could be redesigned to allow for appropriately-sized liner buildings and/or below-grade levels could be incorporated into the design. In the event that any portions of the garage façade is visible beyond the buildings or from the street, it must be treated appropriately so as to not visibly detract from the surrounding areas.

The full memo is after the jump. It addresses not only the garage itself, but also the whole parking picture for this part of the project. The memo was flagged on Twitter this week by Common Council member Leah Golby, who's part of the council's ad hoc committee reviewing the amendments to the project.

The parking issue is shaping up to be the focal point of the debate over the amendments to this project, which aims to clear two whole blocks of the Park South neighborhood for new retail, office, and residential development. The companies involved with the development -- Columbia Development and Tri-City Rentals -- have asserted that without the parking spaces provided by the proposed garage, the project is not feasible.

A "fly around" rendering of the proposed total redevelopment of the two blocks in Park South.

As it happens, the project amendment (page 6) that would open the way for the parking garage doesn't cover the structure's size, height, capacity, or appearance. Instead, it's focused on the footprint of the garage, specifically whether it should be allowed to be built on land currently occupied by a building at 407 Myrtle Ave (Bolton Hall). If the Common Council approves the parking garage amendment, the specific plans for the garage would head back to the city planning board for review and possible modification and approval.

So here's how the timeline for this process shapes up over the next month, as explained to us by Common Council president pro tem Richard Conti, who's also part of the ad hoc committee:

+ There's a public hearing before the Common Council on the project amendments December 2 at 7 pm.

+ The council's ad hoc committee will then meet to review the amendments again, and issue an recommendation to the full council. The date for this meeting has not yet been determined.

+ The full Common Council will take up the amendments for a vote. The council's last scheduled meeting of the year is December 16. And if the council doesn't act on the amendments before the end of the year -- when its current term expires -- the whole process will have to start over. So there's a lot of incentive to work through these amendments during the next month.

+ If the Common Council approves the amendments, the project would be submitted to the city planning board for review and approval.

+ If the planning board approves the project, demolition and construction can then begin.

Planning board staff memo

As posted by Councilwoman Leah Golby on Twitter:

Park South Planning Bd Staff Memo by lgolby


The reason this is not feasible without the parking deck is because the design depends on parking! This is a plan that contributes nothing to the fabric of the city. It lacks imagination, vision and consideration for the people who do (and will) live here. The "developers" want to build a mini-city without any concern for sustainability, impact or long-term viability. Shoot the whole thing down and let the new administration force a complete redesign that comports with a longer-term vision for Albany's future.

We should make it easier and better for people to live in the City of Albany and use mass transit to travel to work in the City of Albany. Use of public funds, including tax incentives or exemptions, to support that goal should be considered.

Making it easier for people to live outside the City of Albany and commute to work in private automobiles undermines that goal and using public funds to do so is wrong-headed.

Further, anything we do that makes it easier for more people to bring more cars into Albany's neighborhoods contributes to air pollution and global warming, fosters increased dependence on foriegn oil, and diminishes our own ability to travel within the city.

We can be the city that says there is a better way.


Sandor Schuman
29 Magnolia Terrace
Albany NY 12209

Say Something!

We'd really like you to take part in the conversation here at All Over Albany. But we do have a few rules here. Don't worry, they're easy. The first: be kind. The second: treat everyone else with the same respect you'd like to see in return. Cool? Great, post away. Comments are moderated so it might take a little while for your comment to show up. Thanks for being patient.

What's All Over Albany?

All Over Albany is for interested and interesting people in New York's Capital Region. In other words, it's for you. It's kind of like having a smart, savvy friend who can help you find out what's up. Oh, and our friends call us AOA.


Recently on All Over Albany

No precedent: The life of Kate Stoneman

The bar exam is one of the toughest tests anyone seeking a professional license must take. Imagine spending months studying for this one test, cramming... (more)

Piled up

As we miss out on on the Nor'easter of the week (thankfully), the National Weather Service Albany put together a map of snowfall totals from... (more)

Solar Energy for Everyone info event

A group of environmental and renewable energy orgs are sponsoring a "Solar Energy for Everyone" event March 28 at East Greenbush Methodist Church. Poster blurbage:... (more)

Central Drone New York

The Cuomo admin and others have been trying make the corridor between Syracuse and Rome a hot spot for the drone industry, and Syracuse could... (more)

What's up in the The Neighborhood

Among the topics in this most recent spin around the Capital Region's online neighborhood: Schenectady pizza, Middle Eastern cuisine, groceries at CVS, baking soda, an... (more)

Recent Comments

Washington Avenue definitely needs more than one lane in each direction, but that doesn't mean it can't be redesigned. They can reduce the size of the lanes, add a median, and add a protected bike lane where the shoulder of the road now lies. I agree, however, that the entire Harriman loop would have to be redesigned and that includes those over-passes, so this would be an extremely expensive undertaking if they want to do it right. But there could be significant development on the land that is now wasted by asphalt that could offset that cost and bulk up the tax base for the city.

An orchard for Washington Park

...has 3 comments, most recently from Craig

Morning Blend for Mar 21

...has 1 comment, most recently from grandmastergus

The state is looking for someone to design murals for the ESP food court

...has 1 comment, most recently from Justin Devendorf

International Tuesday at The Low Beat

...has 1 comment, most recently from Erin T.

Cynthia Nixon is running for governor

...has 4 comments, most recently from Steve