New York State's highest court rejects bid to ban large sodas

nys court of appeals exterior

The state Court of Appeals building in downtown Albany.

New York State's highest court -- the Court of Appeals -- issued a decision today that blocks New York City's much-talked about attempt to cap the size of containers for sodas and other sugary beverages at certain outlets. The 4-2 ruling rejected an appeal of lower court decisions by the city's Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.

There are a lot of issues that intersect at the point of a 16-ounce soda -- health, business, personal liberty -- but the court's ruling was focused on... separation of powers.

Specifically, the majority opinion argued that the city's Board of Health, a part of the health department, had overstepped its authority in issuing the ban on soda containers larger than 16 ounces because it was acting in a legislative rather than regulatory capacity. From the opinion by Judge Eugene F. Pigott, Jr:

By restricting portions, the Board necessarily chose between ends,including public health, the economic consequences associated with restricting profits by beverage companies and vendors, tax implications for small business owners, and personal autonomy with respect to the choices of New York City residents concerning what they consume. Most obviously, the Portion Cap Rule embodied a compromise that attempted to promote a healthy diet without significantly affecting the beverage industry. This necessarily implied a relative valuing of health considerations and economic ends, just as a complete prohibition of sugary beverages would have. Moreover, it involved more than simply balancing costs and benefits according to pre-existing guidelines; the value judgments entailed difficult and complex choices between broad policy goals - choices reserved to the legislative branch.

In this case, the legislative branch is the New York City Council. Let's skip ahead a few paragraphs:

... when an agency in our present time either prohibits the consumption of sugary beverages altogether or discourages it by regulating the size of the containers in which the drinks are served, its choices raise difficult, intricate and controversial issues of social policy. Few people would wish to risk the physical safety of their children who play near high-rise apartment windows for the sake of unobstructed views. However, the number of people who over-indulge in sugary drinks, at a risk to their health, is clearly significant. An agency that adopts a regulation, such as the Portion Cap Rule or an outright prohibition of sugary beverages, that interferes with commonplace daily activities preferred by large numbers of people must necessarily wrestle with complex value judgments concerning personal autonomy and economics. That is policy-making, not rule-making.

The dissenting opinion from Judge Susan Phillips Read is interesting in part because it includes a condensed history of how New York City has attempted to handle public health issues over the last two centuries. In her opinion, she argues that the majority's take on whether the Board of Health overstepped its bounds doesn't match with the city's long history of the topic. Rather, she argues, it's just an attempt to cover for the fact that the majority "does not believe it to be a good idea for the Board to mandate the portion size of sugary drinks." She also points out that there apparently wasn't a problem when the Board banned restaurants from using trans fats.

It's a good bet that more topics like the soda portion cap will come along in the next handful of years. As a culture, we seem to be at a place where we're OK with being all up in each other's business about how we eat. Maybe it's the upswing in obesity, maybe it's that there's more attention on health care and health care costs, maybe it's just the proliferation of foodies. We're guessing it's easier to push rules like the soda portion cap through an agency like a department of health than it is through a legislative body because there's often going to be public outcry. You know, who doesn't have an opinion on stuff like this? Everyone eats.

So it'll be interesting to see if this ruling affects the course of these topics in the state.

Elsewhere: NYT: City Loses Final Appeal on Limiting Sales of Large Sodas

Say Something!

We'd really like you to take part in the conversation here at All Over Albany. But we do have a few rules here. Don't worry, they're easy. The first: be kind. The second: treat everyone else with the same respect you'd like to see in return. Cool? Great, post away. Comments are moderated so it might take a little while for your comment to show up. Thanks for being patient.

The Scoop

Ever wish you had a smart, savvy friend with the inside line on what's happening around the Capital Region? You know, the kind of stuff that makes your life just a little bit better? Yeah, we do, too. That's why we created All Over Albany. Find out more.

Recently on All Over Albany

A quick recap of the week

Here are a few highlights from the past week on AOA: + We gave away tickets to the Gathering of the Farm Cideries by asking:... (more)

Today's moment of winter

Walking up State Street, for a moment, it was all blue skies, sunshine, and wispy clouds. Then it was February again.... (more)

The untaxed city within the city

The map above depicts parcels in the city of Albany from which, for various reasons, the city doesn't get property taxes. It's from a slide... (more)

"I wish we'd asked, 'What can we do for you?'"

Over at City Lab there's an interesting look at how some of the people involved with the creating the very popular High Line park in... (more)

Way more than 3 points

Hitting the half court shot wasn't the big surprise, as it turned out. Though the made basket wasn't in the plan! (That Gazette article includes... (more)

Recent Comments

Is there a volunteer group of any kind that clears sidewalks, crosswalks, and bus stops after storms for people who can't do it themselves or places that don't have anyone to look after it? I'd be interested and willing to pitch in, provided I'm not giving anyone a free ride on their civic duty.

Examining the forces and maps that redlined the city of Albany

...has 3 comments, most recently from Paul

The untaxed city within the city

...has 1 comment, most recently from Ben Dover

The EBA building on Lark Street is up for auction

...has 2 comments, most recently from chris burnett

New life for buildings in Schenectady's Eastern Ave neighborhood -- and aspirations to lift the whole neighborhood

...has 6 comments, most recently from Frank Marro

Stuff to do this weekend

...has 1 comment, most recently from mg