This map shows how many violations per day that were registered at each intersection. Why violations per day and not total? See below.

Violations by approach

So, this is a table of how many violations and citations were registered and issue for each intersection approach (not every approach for every red light camera intersection has a camera watching it).

We've done a little math to calculate the number of violations issued per day since the system has been in operation (and issuing citations) at the intersection. Why? Because different intersections have been in operation for different lengths of time, so just comparing the raw totals isn't really a good comparison.

Also we computed a "false positives" rate for each approach to get a sense of how often the system is flagging drivers for something an officer ultimately decides isn't actually a violation.

One thing this doesn't account for is traffic volume at each intersection. That would give an even better sense of the situation.

NB = northbound, SB = southbound, EB = eastbound, WB = westbound.

Please note:

+ The city released numbers for the period July through October 2.

+ The city data release had "SB Central at Colvin" listed, but we're relatively certain that should be "WB Central at Colvin," as that was previously announced multiple places.

+ For whatever reason we couldn't find the activation date for Central and King. If you know it, please share.

+ We have omitted the approaches WB Madison at New Scotland and SB Lark at Madison because we had some trouble reconciling some of the numbers and dates for those intersections and we're hoping to hear back from APD about it.

Violations by intersection

Here's basically the same table, but now all the approaches are grouped by intersection.

A quick look at how Albany's red light camera system has started off

albany red light camera stats map 2015-Oct release

A map depicting the number of violations per day per intersection. There's a larger, clickable map after the jump.


The city of Albany released the first batch of numbers related to its new red light camera system this week.

The APD reports that since the cameras started coming online in July, the system flagged 2,197 potential violations. After reviews by officers, the city sent out 1,356 citations. So about 38 percent of the potential violations were screened out by the human review.

As you've probably heard by now, getting tagged by one of the red light cameras (and the officer review) is a $50 violation (like a parking ticket). The legislation authorizing the system allows the city to place cameras at up to 20 intersections. (It's now up to 15 intersections, the latest coming online October 2.)

The city released numbers for each intersection approach being monitored by the cameras, so let's have a closer look at the numbers to see which intersections had the most violations...

Maps and tables above

The easiest way to walk through this is to just have a look at the maps and tables above in large format (click or scroll all the way up). We'll explain up there.

A few quick thoughts

+ So Everett Road/Watervliet Ave and Northern Blvd/Albany Shaker Road both stand out for high rates of violations. It's worth looking into what's going on in those spots and whether it has something to do with the design of the intersections or some other factor. Or maybe they're just high-traffic-volume spots.

+ Similarly, some of the intersection with high "false positive" rates are worth a look. Example: Westbound Western Ave at Russell Road had the second-highest false positive rate -- and it's that intersection that for so long has had the weird double "stop here" line.

+ Both mayor Kathy Sheehan and police chief Brendan Cox have repeatedly said the motivation for using the red light camera system is safety and a desire to cut down on red light running. But the cameras are also a potential source of revenue -- a point that critics of the system have often raised as reason to be wary of the city using it. The Sheehan admin had budgeted that the camera system would generate about $2 million in revenue for this year. And as the initial implementation of the system stretched longer into this year, that seemed increasingly unlikely. The mayor recently said the city is now expecting something like $200k this year. [@JCEvangelist_TU]

Making any sort of judgement based on the system's experience so far is... not a good idea. But just for the sake of some very rough idea, if the intersections represented above racked up violations over the course of an entire year at the same rate they have so far (which isn't a good bet because the rates are bound to change), it'd be worth about $586,000 in gross violation revenue. That doesn't count the fees paid to the red light camera contractor, a fee per camera per month that's not to exceed the fine revenue generated. [TU]


+ Albany red light camera program set to start soon

+ Albany red light camera intersection map

+ On the road to Albany red light cameras


ahem, that "weird" double stop on Western and Oxford is so residents of Oxford Road can turn in and out of the street.

Did *I* stop there before I lived on that street?
Do I get thoroughly annoyed when drivers don't stop there, now that I live on that street?

Thanks for sharing this.

Revenue is a benefit of, but not for me the principal reason for, the cameras. The principal reason I favor cameras is that they get people to stop. Safety is paramount.

Lower than projected revenues means more people are stopping at the intersections with cameras than we expected. That is a terrific result.

We will never get statistics for the number of lives saved by the cameras because an accident avoided isn't collectable data, but I am convinced lives will be saved if they haven't already.

Obvious conclusions:
These 9 intersections have decent engineering including the yellow interval times and the cameras will lose a LOT of money there because they are not needed and not profitable
EB Frisbee + 2nd Ave EB Delaware + Madison
SB Frisbee + 2nd Ave SB WB Madison + Main
EB Madison + Main EB Clinton + Henry Johnson,
SB Clinton + Henry Johnson WB Central + King
EB Central + King

These 2 intersections are grossly mis-engineered to produce huge amounts of money grab red light camera revenue that would not happen with engineering corrections:
Everett + Watervliet Northern + Shaker

The other 6 intersections would join the first group of 9 where cameras are not needed and are not profitable with just minor tweaks in their engineering factors including yellow times.
Western + Russell Western + Brevator
Central + Colvin Frisbee + 2nd Ave
Washington + Quail Washington + Main

If the engineering were fixed with longer yellow intervals at the 6 + 2 above, the entire money grab scam of the cameras would collapse in a sea of red ink losses.

James C. Walker, Life Member - National Motorists Association

Have you been able to obtain any accident data from these intersections?

"We will never get statistics for the number of lives saved by the cameras because an accident avoided isn't collectable data, but I am convinced lives will be saved if they haven't already."

Not quite true. The number of accidents/injuries/deaths at those intersections prior to camera installation is known for any period of time we want to measure.

The number of accidents/injuries/deaths say, one year later is also measurable.

The difference (if any) can tentatively be attributed, at least in part, to the cameras.

Hi there. Comments have been closed for this item. Still have something to say? Contact us.

The Scoop

For a decade All Over Albany was a place for interested and interesting people in New York's Capital Region. It was kind of like having a smart, savvy friend who could help you find out what's up. AOA stopped publishing at the end of 2018.

Recently on All Over Albany

Thank you!

When we started AOA a decade ago we had no idea what was going to happen. And it turned out better than we could have... (more)

Let's stay in touch

This all feels like the last day of camp or something. And we're going to miss you all so much. But we'd like to stay... (more)

A few things I think about this place

Working on AOA over the past decade has been a life-changing experience for me and it's shaped the way I think about so many things.... (more)

Albany tightened its rules for shoveling snowy sidewalks last winter -- so how'd that work out?

If winter ever gets its act together and drops more snow on us, there will be sidewalks to shovel. And shortly after that, Albany will... (more)

Tea with Jack McEneny

Last week we were fortunate enough to spend a few minutes with Jack McEneny -- former state Assemblyman, unofficial Albany historian, and genuinely nice guy.... (more)

Recent Comments

My three year old son absolutely loving riding the train around Huck Finn's (Hoffman's) Playland this summer.

Thank you!

...has 27 comments, most recently from Ashley

Let's stay in touch

...has 4 comments, most recently from mg

A look inside 2 Judson Street

...has 3 comments, most recently from Diane (Agans) Boyle

Everything changes: Alicia Lea

...has 2 comments, most recently from Chaz Boyark

A few things I think about this place

...has 13 comments, most recently from Katherine