Counting calories at The Cheesecake Factory
It's Forget the Resolution week on AOA: a whole lineup of foods that can send your New Year's resolution to eat better/eat less/exercise more/lose weight to its timely end.
No one entering a place called "The Cheesecake Factory" has any business thinking they're about to eat anything remotely healthy. But even with that in mind, we were rather taken aback when the chain started included calories counts on its menus (as all chains are now required to do in Albany County). It's one thing to know the food is a sometimes-only indulgence -- it's another to see the actual calorie counts.
So, given that the whole premise of Forget the Resolution week is to totally blow out any notion of healthy eating, we figured a trip to The Factory was in order.
Our mission was simple: find, order and eat the dish with the most number of calories.
The federal government recommends that an adult should eat about 2,000 calories per day (a bit more for men, a little less for women -- all depending on physical activity). So, knowing what TCF is capable of, we were really hoping to land a dish north of the 3,000 calorie mark. That would be about 150 percent of a day's calories in one dish.
The winner, after scanning the novella-length menu: "Bistro Shrimp Pasta," which clocks in at 2730 calories. It's impressive total, but Cheesecake -- we were really expecting more out of you.
Amazingly, this caloric chart-topper includes, of all things, arugula. Really. From the menu:
Crispy Battered Shrimp, Fresh Mushrooms, Tomato and Arugula Tossed with Spaghettini and a Basil-Garlic-Lemon Cream Sauce.
When our order arrives at the table, we take a moment to admire the sight of what appears to be roughly a pound of pasta in cream sauce with battered shrimp. It looks like enough to feed a family of four.
We dig in. The shrimp is nicely cooked and its breading is, surprisingly, rather restrained. The cream sauce doesn't taste heavy. The spaghetti is a bit overcooked and a little clumpy in places. The veg doesn't taste like much, though the arugula does add some needed pepperiness. The whole dish isn't bad -- it's just not that great, either. For all those calories, it was strangely bland, like it needed acid, spice, something. There wasn't much bang for the (caloric) buck.
There were two of us working on the dish and we put a sizable dent into it before calling it quits (though there was still enough for a generous leftover portion).
But here's the thing: we could have kept eating. Really, it didn't feel like we had eaten that much, even though we probably each had put away about 1,000 calories. Whatever they've done to the food (and we're not sure we want to know), it makes the calories goes down easy. Way too easy.
And that brings us back to the calorie counts. As much as they kill the indulgence buzz, the counts are helpful. Even though our stomachs were telling us "There's more room! Keep going! Don't stop!" -- our heads, calorie counts in mind, were saying "Whoa! Hold up!" Which is pretty much the point.
Score one for the calorie counts. Now, who's up for some cheesecake?
Also from Forget the Resolution week:
+ Akum vs. The Machine at Uncle Dan's Diner
+ The Deep Fried Hamburger at Swifty's
+ Chicharrones at Mr. Pio Pio
+ "Philly Steak" at Morrette's
+ Fajita nachos at Pancho's
Find It
The Cheesecake Factory
Colonie Center
Colonie, NY 12205
Hi there. Comments have been closed for this item. Still have something to say? Contact us.
Comments
That's the biggest calorie packer? A pasta dish? Soooo boring.
Too bad the Judge's Inn closed - they had a pizza on their menu that came topped with oaxacan cheese, roast beef, french fries, and gravy, among other things that I've now forgotten. Now that would've packed some calories....
... said jess on Feb 24, 2011 at 5:29 PM | link
This goes to show that the high calorie count is really more about portion size than the ingredients. If you just read those ingredients (a fair amount of vegetables), you'd never imagine this was unusually high in calories. And it wouldn't be at a normal serving size. Even the picture doesn't convey hugeness, except I guess that plate must be gigantic.
... said chrisck on Feb 24, 2011 at 7:52 PM | link
This one is rather disturbing, considering it's a kids' meal:
http://eatthis.menshealth.com/node/98426
... said Reut on Feb 25, 2011 at 9:36 AM | link
I love, love, LOVE their chicken romano and white chicken chili. The chili is probably one of their more reasonable entrees, at 800-something calories for a large bowl. The chicken romano- not so much.
Oh, and don't forget all that bread and butter they load you up with...
... said Summer on Feb 25, 2011 at 12:19 PM | link
Took my sister there Thursday for a late birthday dinner. Her birthday is in Jan. Burr, sometimes too cold to venture out! The place was busy, we did not wait too long. we were seated on the long row facing the noisy, loud bar. There was a young family with a 2 year old on one side . On the other was a very nice, older, married couple, who had just celebrated their 60th wedding anniversary! My shrimp scampi was very good. I almost chocked on the peel, it was hard to see in that lighting! My steak was way too peppery, and gave me acid reflux! We found the place too noisy,felt crowded in, and were worried about the little boy geting food on our coats! He kept trying to bang his feet on the wood. His mom had to keep telling him not too. My portion was too small for the $19.95 price! Would only get my food to go from therefrom now on! It is not a relaxing dining experience!
... said mg on Mar 5, 2011 at 4:14 AM | link