Park South redevelopment plan advances

park_south_parking_garage_designs_2013-12-13_5.jpg

One of the two new options for the Park South parking garage presented by developers.

The Albany Common Council passed the resolutions necessary to advance the $110 million Park South redevelopment Monday night. The project -- which includes wiping two whole blocks clear in the neighborhood by Albany Med -- now moves on to further review by the city's planning board.

There wasn't really any drama about whether the resolutions would pass -- and they did so easily, each with 10 votes in favor (out of 13 present council members.)

A portion of the the council's actions Monday covered three amendments to a redevelopment plan approved in 2006: increasing the height of mixed-use buildings along New Scotland Ave, increasing the number of residential units, and changing the footprint of a parking garage. Those first two amendments weren't controversial, but the parking garage -- specifically its size and appearance -- had drawn a lot of attention during the process. And it did again Monday night.

Council member Leah Golby, who lives on Myrtle Ave just about a block from the development site and has been a vocal critic of the parking garage, again reiterated her opposition to the scale of the garage -- roughly double the capacity of the garage in the original plan -- and the effect she believes it will have on the neighborhood's traffic and the Myrtle Ave streetscape. And while she praised changes recently made to the plan by the developers to accommodate feedback about the garage, she said that keeping the garage in the range of 816 parking spaces was not an adequate compromise.

"I've said to the developers that they're winning [on project design] on New Scotland Ave, on Morris Street, on Dana Ave, in this plan. But for Myrtle Avenue, it is not a walkable [design] on that block."

A few other council members expressed that they, too, still had some reservations about the plan -- but on balance, they believed it to be a positive step forward.

"It's really difficult to turn down $110 million in a neighborhood that really needs it," said council president Carolyn McLaughlin in an overview of the situation. "But I learned two things here. Even though big developers come in and say they want things like this, we don't run and say, yes, we'll take your money -- there's lots of questions that have to be asked, lots of needs that have to be met. And I think that's what has taken place here. While we want to encourage other [developers] to come into our city and make this kind of investment, we also want them to know that you will be scrutinized."

park south option 2 site plan

Speaking in favor of the project Monday night, council member Richard Conti described how the Park South neighborhood had been heading in the wrong direction over the last few decades, plagued by crime and problems with absentee landlords. He praised Albany Med's investment there, describing it as a "bulwark against total disaster," and commended Tri-City Rentals for committing to the significant residential portion of the plan (268 units). "Sometimes we are critical of big institutions, but I think we also recognize the contributions they make, as well."

Mayor-elect Kathy Sheehan also made an appearance at the meeting, speaking during the public comment period about the project to encourage approval of the resolutions. "I think the proposal that you're voting on today is a far better proposal than what it was when it first came to this body."

The council's votes are just one more step as the project advance toward actually starting demolition and construction. Many of the details will now be up for review by the city's planning board, and the city's industrial development agency will review the mix of requested tax breaks and incentives. So there's a lot more still to come.

The Park South redevelopment is an interesting, unusual project. It's not every day -- heck, it's not every decade -- that this much money is aimed at transforming a neighborhood in the Capital Region, especially an urban area. It will be worth watching.

Earlier on AOA:
+ Two new options for Park South
+ Six not-boring parking garages
+ A bit more about the Park South redevelopment and that big parking garage
+ A big topic for the Park South redevelopment: parking
+ The big plan for residential and retail redevelopment in Albany's Park South

Comments

Not super-in-love with the design, but it's better than what's there.

The size of the parking garage is absurd. Again, the developers, government and Albany Med have the opportunity to develop something cutting-edge and unique, but unfortunately are settling for mediocre and average. As usual.

I was just reading how parking garages in many cities are often half empty, even during the times when demand is highest. That is wasted space and wasted money that could be put to much better use.

I'm disappointed that the parking garage piece got through, but am hoping that the parties involved in the next steps (namely the Mayor-elect and the Planning Department and those entities that will decide if tax cuts will be given) work to mitigate those issues that are concerns to the community members and folks like myself who commute by foot/bus through this congested corridor. For the life of me, I don’t understand why we don’t seize this opportunity to reinvest in the maze of existing surface parking lots that dominate the University Heights neighborhood by building a parking garage there, as opposed to the current proposal of removing more prime developable land towards parking and tax-exempt parking to boot. This is a poor and short sighted decision by all stakeholders involved :(

This is beyond pathetic. The last thing this city needs is more tax exempt property! Shame on the city council and Kathy Sheehan! AMC is already getting RED Council money, and now asking for IDA money, tax credits and tax exemptions for this monstrosity, after completely gutting a plan that had community support. Way to completely undermine the neighborhood that has to pay to support this POS, as if property owners aren't already overtaxed and overburdened in this city! The city completely dropped the ball with negotiations. I understand that we need to support the hospital, but that doesn't mean we should lay down and let Columbia Development do whatever the hell they want. There is no way in hell that a 268 unit rental project needs 816 parking spots, even with additional medical space and retail. There is enough parking in this city! God forbid anyone takes a bus or walks to an appointment. I guess I just have to settle with a parking garage eyesore and a bunch of incompetent decision makers that will whore themselves out for any bit of money they can get. Way to go Albany, way to go.

I'm disappointed that the parking garage piece got through, but am hoping that the parties involved in the next steps (namely the Mayor-elect and the Planning Department and those entities that will decide if tax cuts will be given) work to mitigate those issues that are concerns to the community members and folks like myself who commute by foot/bus through this congested corridor. For the life of me, I don’t understand why we don’t seize this opportunity to reinvest in the maze of existing surface parking lots that dominate the University Heights neighborhood by building a parking garage there, as opposed to the current proposal of removing more prime developable land towards parking and tax-exempt parking to boot. This is a poor and short sighted decision by all stakeholders involved :(
+1

Say Something!

We'd really like you to take part in the conversation here at All Over Albany. But we do have a few rules here. Don't worry, they're easy. The first: be kind. The second: treat everyone else with the same respect you'd like to see in return. Cool? Great, post away. Comments are moderated so it might take a little while for your comment to show up. Thanks for being patient.

The Scoop

Ever wish you had a smart, savvy friend with the inside line on what's happening around the Capital Region? You know, the kind of stuff that makes your life just a little bit better? Yeah, we do, too. That's why we created All Over Albany. Find out more.

Recently on All Over Albany

Capital Region holiday markets 2017

The unofficial official holiday shopping season starts up Friday. If you're looking for something a little bit different -- craftier, handmade, more independent, fair trade... (more)

What's up in the Neighborhood

Among the topics in this most recent spin around the Capital Region's online neighborhood: old signs, public baths, mountain biking, hiking, new woods, the Adirondack... (more)

Tracking the paths of many steps

Maybe you've seen this heat map of activity posted by the exercise tracking service Strava. It basically shows the most popular routes taken by people... (more)

Morning Blend

Accused shooter in Albany death arrested, and dies later in the day Albany police announced Tuesday that they had arrested Taron Robinson, who was accused... (more)

Window shopping at the grocery, then

Check out this Pearl Street pic from the 1940s posted from the Albany Group Archive on Flickr. The Albany Muskrat highlighted it on Twitter... (more)

Recent Comments

I'm glad to see people involved in community decisions. But at the same time, we can't just keep saying we want development "somewhere else" or "not in my backyard!". Having mini-suburbs in the city of Albany was feasible at one point in time, and now development is catching up. ...

Albany Book & Paper Fair 2017

...has 1 comment, most recently from Richard Adamiak Ph.D.

Morning Blend for Nov 22

...has 1 comment, most recently from Gabby

As it turns out, Tucker Carlson's understanding of Albany demographics is lacking

...has 18 comments, most recently from -B

Private dorm opposition, a big downtown residential conversion, and other exciting tales of the Albany Planning Board

...has 7 comments, most recently from daleyplanit

Here's every violation issued by the city of Albany over the last three winters for not shoveling a sidewalk

...has 6 comments, most recently from Harriet